For this reason it gets our Editors Choice Award. The Studio 68 does not have the onboard DSP feature, and the Studio 24 and 26 are powered thru the USB connection which are not recommended for live use it is lower-amperage and it can become unstable. Hi Presonus, I am considering your new Studio 192 interface as it has a lot of features I appreciate (DSP powered, Z-latency mix, seamless punch in etc). PreSonus Studio 192 26x32 USB 3.0 Audio Interface and Studio Command Center 4.3 out of 5 stars 60. The great news is that it really does work, I had a guitar plugged in via my Eleven Rack and had the buffer size in the song set to 4096, which should give me a round trip latency of around 200ms - hit the 'Z' logo on the channel and you have very low latency, in fact so low I was unaffected by it. Seeing is believing—and in many cases, understanding. NOTE: Throughout this article whenever I use the phrase zero latency I put it in speech marks, either because I'm using it as shorthand for low latency or because I'm referring to the term used by PreSonus for their low latency monitoring system. Next-Level Performance with Low Latency Contact one of our regional U.S. sales representatives. Trusted content from independent music and post production experts. The Studio 192 comes with the Artist version of PreSonus’s own Studio One recording software, which has recently had a comprehensive, touch–focused overhaul; the latest version 3 of Studio One was reviewed at length in the September 2015 issue of Sound On Sound. We've been making recording interfaces for a long time. Granted you get a lot more than just the low latency monitoring in a Pro Tools HDX system, but over the years many small studios have spent a lot of money simply to get the low latency from Pro Tools HD or some of the added extras like unlimited track count and input monitoring, if you run your studio through conventional hardware and a mixer then you should be looking at this solution it' a fraction of the cost. As a Pro Tools user I've owned a HDX system so I know what this experience is, although as a composer using a lot of VI plug-ins and also using several DAWs I decided to sell it as it really didn't really offer me the advantage it offers to some like large studio or those who use it with the Pro Tools AAX DSP plug-ins. QuantumStudio 192Studio 1824 Check out stories about tours by PreSonus artists, love letters and videos from customers, and more. Tight integration with the included Studio One digital audio workstation provides remote control over every Studio 192 microphone preamp plus onboard zero-latency monitor mixing control right from your recording environment. However, they are not able to help keep virtual instruments free of disruptive latency, as those instruments must run within the DAW's native audio engine. Studio 192 is an ultra-low-latency USB 3.0 audio interface and studio command center in one rackspace. Well that's the theory, so we decided to put the new PreSonus Studio 192 through its paces checking the 'zero latency' claim as well as the sound and the user experience.When it comes to getting audio in and out of a computer there's an elephant that has been in the room since the advent of DAWs, namely latency. The Studio 192 comes with the Artist version of PreSonus’s own Studio One recording software, which has recently had a comprehensive, touch–focused overhaul; the latest version 3 of Studio One was reviewed at length in the September 2015 issue of Sound On Sound. UPDATED 1-31-20 to add new interfaces! Depending on the DAW and the application some of these work better than others but none offer the same integrated experience that you would get with Pro Tools HD/HDX - no second layer simply monitor via Pro Tools at very low latency. Studio One Integration. There is no loss of functionality with this configuration.' A couple of caveats - it doesn't work when you are using VIs, or native plug-ins - however it does work with the DSP based Fat Channels, so if you want to track something with a plug-in then you can instigate them in the process, Marcus has done an excellent video of this here. Then you get the same kind of Pro Tools HD tracking experience with Studio One - but we are talking about an audio interface costing $900 not $10,000. Our extensive knowledgebase can save you hours of troubleshooting and messages to technical support. As best as I can tell from just checking TAFKAT's DAW Bench Forum, he measured past Presonus interfaces as having the same RTL latency as their competitors, within 1 ms or so. Take advantage of Studio One ® Fat Channel plug-in processing on every analog input and the first eight ADAT input channels, with near-zero-latency (2 ms, input to output) monitoring. For amazing deals on gear visit Sweetwater.com. If you've ever found yourself with a huge track with lots of plug-ins, with some on the master bus (which can add a lot of latency) and then needed to overdub a vocal or guitar then you'll know what a pain it can be. A few approaches have appeared during the years, the most notable is perhaps Pro Tools HD/HDX, using dedicated DSP to process the audio and to offer a near-zero latency experience. So if you use external hardware and synths then you are going to be very happy. The second option is to buy an interface that has a piece of software that you can use to monitor through when tracking, all the top companies offer this from Focusrite, RME, Apogee and of course the ubiquitous Universal Apollo with its Console application. PreSonus Studio 24c 2x2, 192 kHz, USB-C Audio Interface, 2 Mic Pres-2 Line Outs & Presonus Eris E3.5-3.5" Near Field Studio Monitor (Pair) (E3.5) 5.0 out of 5 stars 1 $259.90 Because of this, OS X 10.10.x / 10.9.x users must connect their Studio 192 with a USB 2.0 cable. Purchase of the Studio 192 provides access to two pieces of software which allow you to make greater use of the hardware. Purchase PreSonus software, hardware, accessories and apparel straight from the source. The PreSonus Studio 192 is an audio interface and studio command center combined in one rack space. So I'm less inclined to argue for DSP based DAWs these days now that computers are far more powerful - I will often work on an entire song in Studio One with my buffer set at 32/64 samples its so rock solid, so latency really isn't a big deal to me. Simply create or log into your My.PreSonus account. Not to mention the ability to grow your system as your needs increase, with 1 or 2 DP88's. Well that's the theory, so we decided to put the new PreSonus Studio 192 through its paces checking the 'zero latency' claim as well as the sound and the user experience.When it comes to getting audio in and out of a computer there's an elephant that has been in the room since the advent of DAWs, namely latency. This might come in handy if you’re in the market for a new recording interface. So who would would really benefit from this Studio 192 interface? I don't have to use usbC as a connection so is the 192 faster? It offers 26 x 32 I/O and pristine audio quality up to 192 kHz with 8 digitally controlled XMAX™ Class A mic preamps and flexible connectivity options. Presonus Studio 192 routing/monitoring/latency question I need a USB interface with preferably 8 channels, that I can plug external pre amps into by ADAT and SPDIF, and also through analog inputs. Whether you use Mac®, Windows®, or iOS®, we have an interface that fits your application and budget. The reality is that Studio One is so rock solid and efficient that I rarely track at high buffer settings but it is good to know it is possible, I do have one session player who swears blind they can hear the latency and has me use the third party applications to give them their monitor mix, using the Studio 192 removes the need for the 2nd layer monitoring application as Studio One and the UC layer work together seamlessly. Let's unpack that first, as I said already I sold my Pro Tools HDX hardware as I felt that it offered little benefit to me as a composer using VIs, especially with the limited AAX DSP plug-ins available for my kind of work I simply could not justify the ownership. Over 10ms RTL at 64 samples buffer. 24-in/24-out Hybrid Thunderbolt/USB 2.0/iOS Audio Interface with 8 Mic Pres, V-Limit Clipping Protection, 8 TRS Outputs, ADAT and S/PDIF Digital I/O, AVB Ethernet Compatibility, and 48-channel DSP Mixer Onboard with Processing and Effects - Mac/PC A small thing to note is that 'there is a known issue in OS X 10.10.x and OS X 10.9.x that prevents audio from streaming over USB 3.0 when connected from a USB 3.0 Audio Interface (such as the Studio 192) to a USB 3.0 Port on a Mac system. The main area where the Studio 192 solution differs from other interfaces with their bundled low latency software, is that one can do tape style monitoring and seamless punch-ins. 0 votes. I'm not saying I wouldn't - but for me the 'zero latency' is most appreciated when tracking live instruments, synths, vocals, or dialogue, then it's a dream. PreSonus Studio 192 USB3 Audio Interface Review Enter the new PreSonus Studio 192 USB audio interface, which when used with Studio One software offers an integrated 'zero latency' tracking experience - so to all intents and purposes Studio One HD. You have probably read this far and can guess the punchline but I need to explain a little before I get to that. We’ve posted hundreds of videos explaining the features of our products and how to get the most from them. PreSonus are aware of this and I'm sure they are working on a solution. PreSonus call it 'zero latency' but we have been unable to get the actual round-trip latency figures. Das PreSonus ® Studio 192 USB 3.0 Audio-Interface bietet eine herausragende Klangqualität, flexible Anschlussoptionen sowie professionelle Bedienelemente für das Monitoring und die Mischung in einer einzigen 19" Höheneinheit. Click the image above to download a convenient PDF to get a convenient at-a-glance look at I/O, sampling rates, connectivity methods, and more. More than just abundant I/O, Studio 192 is designed to be the central hub for any project or professional studio. The video is entitled; New Studio Headphone Setup, iPad, Presonus Studio 192,HP2. For me this is a no go and I'm thinking about sending it back. In this video I compare 3 of Presonus rack mount audio interfaces. They have the best service in the business. ; Use the Studio 192 as your studio command center with monitor mixing, speaker switching, and two independent headphone outputs. Enjoy! The analog line ins should go straight to ADC. StudioLive Series III Ecosystem Learn how the PreSonus StudioLive Series III Mixers can help you build a system that is tailored to your needs today but readily expandable as your needs evolve over time. For amazing deals on gear visit Sweetwater.com. Below are the minimum computer-system requirements for UC Surface, QMix-UC, and Studio One®. With the onboard DSP you simply hit the 'Z' and the latency is as good as gone. Studio 192 is a USB 3.0 audio interface and studio command center in one rackspace. PreSonus’s Studio 192 interface offers onboard DSP and, as well, integrates directly with Studio One, a significant feature for recording workflow. Yes I love what Presonus have created with the Studio 192, a well specced, high quality audio interface with 'HD' type experience. If you want to buy or need support outside of the U.S., find your local distributor here. Depending on the settings for Device Block Size and Dropout Protection, native low-latency monitoring can be achieved even with complex songs using many plug-ins and virtual instruments. We installed this and then launched it, within a few seconds the Studio 192 interface was showing up as an available interface, it also prompted us to update the firmware. I felt the latency so I checked it. Period! Unable to fully monitor through ONLY pro tools with Studio 192, bypassing hardware monitoring Pops and crackles issues at Low latency for VST instruments with busy mix in Studio One 4.5 Is it possible to have hardware monitoring enable and bypass it on one track? For those new to audio recording that's the time it takes for the computer to process the audio entering the computer and spit it back out so we can hear it. Having said that, although I did indeed decide to move to a native solution, that decision was based on weighing the benefits of an HDX card's 'zero latency' monitoring against the large investment... based on a $900 investment that's a completely different proposition. One of these days, we’ll be in your town—and this calendar will tell you when, where, and what we’ll show you. Software and driver updates, tutorials, manuals and more! Solutions, training, and lesson plans for educators in music technology and music performance. 23 views. In this video, Marcus Huyskens speaks about the different Low Latency Monitoring options in available in Studio One 3.5 and above. Even if you want to use another DAW then the PreSonus Studio 192 is great value for money, you still get the features, the sound and the control of the preamps from any MIDI enabled DAW. 5 offers from ... -to-DAW architecture that was designed to transport your audio to and from your DAW with an imperceptible amount of latency. The box contained the Studio 192 (which physically is VERY well made, solid and quite heavy), a startup guide, minimal manual, Presonus sticker, power supply and USB 3.0 Cable. Curious about the latency of USBc on the 1824c which appears to using usb2.0 as compared to the USB3 on the 192. It appears my VSL 1818 USB 2.0 with Studio One 3 Artist does not have the Zero Latency function, why not? ; Use the Studio 192 as your studio command center with monitor mixing, speaker switching, and two independent headphone outputs. Studio 192 Mobile is an ultra-low-latency USB 3.0 audio interface and studio command center. Simultaneously stream up to 26 inputs and 32 outputs at 48 kHz —8x14 at 192 kHz. I was impressed with the sound of both stuff going in and coming out of the PreSonus Studio 192, it certainly belies its price tag. ; Audio Interfaces Finder We've been making recording interfaces for a long time. Interface is an Maudio 192-4 I used to be able to record guitars at an input latency of 2.9ms(128 samples, 44.1Khz), and all of a sudden at 128 I get 6.71ms/296samples at the same settings.